Evaluation Study

A HISTOLOGIC EVALUATION OF FAILED DENTAL IMPLANTS FOR OVERLOADING

A. Scarano1 ORCID, S. A. Gehrke2 ORCID, P.S. de Oliveira3 ORCID, P.C. Guidone4, S.R. Tari1

1 Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
2 Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
3 Department of Oral Implantology, Research Division, UNINGÁ - Cachoeiro de Itapemirim, Brazil
4 University Hospital "Ospedali Riuniti" of Foggia, Foggia, Italy

Correspondence to:

Antonio Scarano, DDS, MD
Department of Innovative Technology in Medicine and Dentistry,
University of Chieti-Pescara “G. d’Annunzio,
Via Dei Vestini 31,
66100 Chieti Italy

Annals of Stomatology 2024 September-December; 4(3): 98-101
DOI https://doi.org/10.69129/stomatol/2024v4iss3_2


Received: 16 November 2024 Accepted: 30 December 2024


Copyright © by LAB srl 2024 ISSN 2975-1276
This publication and/or article is for individual use only and may not be further reproduced without written permission from the copyright holder. Unauthorized reproduction may result in financial and other penalties. Disclosure: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Download Download PDF

Abstract

Osseointegrated implants have shown excellent clinical results, demonstrating their effectiveness in various medical applications. However, it is important to note that about 3-10% of these implants fail within a 10-year period. This highlights the need to understand the histologic response to reduce the incidence of implant loss over time. The aim of the present study was a histological analysis of the features of the tissues surrounding implant-failed titanium implants to try to understand the causal determinants. Dental titanium screw-shaped implants were removed for mobility. The implant had been placed in the jaw three months earlier. The implant was retrieved with a trephine. In the most coronal and apical parts of the implants, no mineralized tissues were present in contact with the dental implant. At low magnification, bone was observed at 200μ distance to the implant. In conclusion, the histological aspect of the dental implant suggests that overload may be the most likely cause of failure in the present case. However, we cannot be certain that it is the only possible cause in every case.

Keywords: , , ,


LAB Publishers - Scientific Publisher
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible.

Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

View the privacy page on this link Privacy