Comparative Study
OSTEOBLAST ADHESION ON ACID-ETCHED AND MACHINED SURFACES
1 Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
2 Department of Innovative Technologies in Medicine and Dentistry, University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
3 Universidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain
Correspondence to:
Department of Innovative Technology in Medicine and Dentistry,
University of Chieti-Pescara,
Via Dei Vestini 31,
66100 Chieti Italy
e-mail: ascarano@unich.it
Annals of Stomatology 2021 September-December; 1(1): 3-7
https://doi.org/10.69129/stomatol/2021v1iss1_2
Received: 2 September 2021 Accepted: 6 October 2021
Copyright © by LAB srl 2021 ISSN 2975-1276
Abstract
Implants with surface chemical or biomechanical qualities that should encourage bone formation have been developed over the last 30 years. Few systematic investigations have been conducted on surface topography despite the widespread recognition that it is a significant factor influencing bone-implant contact. Four white New Zealand mature rabbits were used in the present investigation. Each rabbit received 2 implants, specially made with 2 surfaces on it (one sandblasted and acid etched and one machined) into each tibia. A total of 16 implants were inserted. All animals were killed 21 days after implant placement. Osteoblast in contact with the implant surface was statistically evaluated. The sandblasted and acid-etched surfaces showed a greater osteoblast contact than the machined, which was statistically significant. The sandblasted and acid-etched surface improves osteoblast adhesion on the implant surface.
Keywords: acid etched, bone contact, bone healing, dental implants, machined implants, osteoblast