Retrospective Observational Study

HEMIARTHROPLASTY IN THE ELDERLY FOR FEMORAL NECK FRACTURES: IS THERE STILL ROOM FOR UNCEMENTED STEM? A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

F. Polidoro1 , F. Raggini2 ORCID, G. Guerra1 ORCID, P. Colombo3, V. Salini4, A. Belluati5 ORCID

1 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
2 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
3 Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University Vita-Salute San Raffaele
4 Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
5 Orthopaedic and Trauma Department, Hospital Santa Maria delle Croci, Ravenna, Italy

Correspondence to:

Federico Polidoro, MD
Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology,
Santa Maria delle Croci Hospital,
Viale Randi 5,
48100 Ravenna, Italy

Journal of Orthopedics 2022 May-Aug; 14(2): 51-56
DOI https://doi.org/10.69149/orthopedics/2022v14iss2_2


Received: 28 May 2022 Accepted: 8 July 2022


Copyright © by LAB srl 2022 ISSN 1973-6401 (print) / 3035-2916 (online)
This publication and/or article is for individual use only and may not be further reproduced without written permission from the copyright holder. Unauthorized reproduction may result in financial and other penalties. Disclosure: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Download Download PDF

Abstract

Femoral neck fractures (FNF) are among the most common fractures in the elderly. Choosing the appropriate treatment is essential to achieve the best outcomes and reduce associated mortality. Despite several guidelines suggesting that cemented stem fixation in hemiarthroplasty for medial FNF is highly effective, the use of uncemented hemiarthroplasty (UCHA) still plays an important role. Material and Methods: From January 2013 to May 2018, we conducted a monocentric study that collected data on elderly patients with FNF treated with UCHA. Patients were followed up clinically and via X-rays at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The group was analyzed for complications, operative time, blood loss, loosening, and prosthesis survival. Results: A total of 638 patients (654 hips) were identified, with a median follow-up period of 25 months. Over time, 270 patients (41.3%) died. The mean age was 84.9 ± 5.41 years. Four patients (0.5%) experienced intraoperative periprosthetic fractures, and 13 patients (2%) underwent a second surgery. Ten patients (1.5%) showed calcar resorption on X-ray. The mean surgical time was 55 minutes, with an average blood loss of 245 cc. No perioperative deaths were recorded (within 0-2 days postoperatively). The implant survival rate was 98.2% at 1 year, 97.7% at 3 years, and 96.7% at 5 years. Conclusion: UCHA remains an excellent alternative, particularly for patients where reducing surgical time and blood loss is crucial while considering their comorbidities.

Keywords: , , , , , , , , ,


LAB Publishers - Scientific Publisher
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible.

Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

View the privacy page on this link Privacy