Retrospective Comparative Study

INFLUENCE OF EARLY VS LATE RETURN TO SPORT ON OUTCOMES IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: A RETROSPECTIVE COMPARATIVE STUDY

E. Mazzini1, G. Placella2 ORCID, N.G. Biavardi2 ORCID, M. Alessio-Mazzola3 ORCID, S. Mosca2 ORCID, V. Salini2

1 Vita-Salute University San Raffaele, Milan
2 Vita-Salute University, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
3 IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Correspondence to:

Mattia Alessio Mazzola, MD
Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC),
University of Genoa,
Viale Benedetto XV n. 6,
16132 Genova, Italy;
IRCCS Orthopaedic Clinic,
Policlinic Hospital San Martino,
Largo Rosanna Benzi 10,
16132 Genova, Italy
e-mail: mattia.alessio@hotmail.com

Journal of Orthopedics 2022 Jan-Apr; 14(1): 1-8
DOI https://doi.org/10.69149/orthopedics/2022v14iss1_7


Received: 20 March 2022 Accepted: 23 April 2022


Copyright © by LAB srl 2022 ISSN 1973-6401 (print) / 3035-2916 (online)
This publication and/or article is for individual use only and may not be further reproduced without written permission from the copyright holder. Unauthorized reproduction may result in financial and other penalties. Disclosure: All authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.

Download Download PDF

Abstract

The optimal timing for return to sport (RTS) following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. Accelerated rehabilitation protocols may increase the risk of re-injury, whereas delayed RTS could enhance recovery outcomes. To investigate the effects of rehabilitation timelines on functional outcomes and reinjury rates post-ACL reconstruction, comparing standard RTS protocols with delayed RTS approaches. In this retrospective cohort study, 54 highly active athletes aged 15-35 years who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft were analyzed. Participants were divided into two groups based on rehabilitation duration: the Standard RTS group (returning to sport within 5-7 months, n=28) following MOON guidelines, and the Delayed RTS group (returning after≥9 months, n=26) adhering to Delaware-Oslo guidelines. Outcomes measured included the Lysholm Knee Score for functional assessment, Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) difference for activity level changes, ACL Return to Sport Index (ACL-RSI) for psychological readiness, and incidence of ACL re-rupture and contralateral ACL injuries over a 30-month follow-up. The Delayed RTS group demonstrated significantly better functional outcomes (Lysholm score: 94.1±4.7 vs 79.6±6.9, p <0.001), smaller reductions in activity levels (TAS difference: -0.33±0.8 vs -1.9 ±0.8, p <0.001), and higher psychological readiness (ACL-RSI: 85.6±13.2 vs 51.9±16.4, p <0.001) compared to the Standard RTS group. The Standard RTS group had a seven-fold increased risk of ACL re-rupture (Relative Risk (RR)=7.0, Odds Ratio (OR)=6.5) and doubled the risk of contralateral ACL injury (RR=2.0, OR=2.17). The combined risk of an ACL injury was significantly higher in the Standard RTS group (RR=3.53, OR=5.27), with an absolute risk increase of 29%. Delaying RTS beyond nine months post-ACL reconstruction significantly improves functional outcomes psychological readiness, and reduces the risk of reinjury compared to standard rehabilitation timelines. These findings support the adoption of extended, criterion-based rehabilitation protocols to optimize patient recovery and enhance long-term knee health.

Keywords: , , , , , ,


LAB Publishers - Scientific Publisher
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible.

Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

View the privacy page on this link Privacy